I start law school in the fall and as I was reading the news on cnn.com, I came across an article concerning law school. The contributing writer is a blogger who I have no knowledge of and therefore decided to research her credentials. After reading her article, I was very shocked that CNN would allow an article with many grammatical errors and innaccurate information concerning law school.
I understand this particular article is not indicative of all bloggers nor should I assume every blog will contain such blunders. However, this does represent how accessible posting misleading information to a reputable online source can be. Although blogs are based on opinion, and everyone has a right to their view, this reflects what we discussed in class. Do blogs allow anyone to become an expert in their opinion? Is this a benefit to the intellectual progression of society? Perhaps I need to research more well-established bloggers, but I think it’s very important that information still be given by professionals.
I’m not sure if it is due to respect for someone’s trade or profession, but if I have questions about my car, I prefer to consult an experienced Mechanic. If I have questions regarding my health, I prefer to consult a doctor. Blogging definitely serves as an excellent tool to provide information to a mass audience. Perhaps we should set restrictions on who can post on given topics by qualifications. The alternative would also be to simply ignore bloggers who do not show to have expertise or experience in their particular field. I have posted the link below to the article I found to be anything but helpful.
http://www.cnn.com/2011/09/26/living/reasons-against-law-school/index.html?hpt=hp_bn8